Share
submit to reddit
Pin it

Last week, the Italian version of Xbox360 Magazine quoted Silent Hill Downpour art director Radek Marek as saying:

"At the moment there will be no multiplayer modes in Silent Hill: Downpour, but Konami are investigating a separate chapter devoted entirely to the Multiplayer. ... We do not know the details but it should be an XBLA title that most players have to survive in the town of Silent Hill."

The quote seemed to be confirmation that Konami was working on a multiplayer Silent Hill project that would likely have ended up being a stand-alone XBox Live downloadable game. But Konami was quick to debunk the claim a few days later, saying that Marek's comment was mistranslated and clarifying:

"Whoever that Italian interviewer was either took Radeks comments completely out of context, or it was lost in translation. As previously mentioned, we were (many moons ago) investigating a separate Multiplayer mode, but that was quickly extinguished when we costed it out and determined how much resource time it would detract from the core singleplayer experience."

So it would seem that Silent Hill fans will be going without any sort of multiplayer mode in the near future. The general consensus is probably that this is a good thing. After all, the Silent Hill games have traditionally been focused on a single-player narrative that relies heavily on themes such as isolation, loneliness, despair, confusion, desperation, helplessness, and claustrophobia that would be impossible to replicate in a multiplayer experience.

Silent Hill Downpour concept art

But hold on just a minute. Let's stop and think about this...

Maybe people are too quick to dismiss the idea of multiplayer Silent Hill and are not giving the topic enough thought.

The writers at Hell's Descent deserve some kudos for giving the topic some thought. In its article about the multiplayer rumor debunking, the site's writer had this to say about the possibility of multiplayer in Silent Hill:

"While the internet went aflame with this multiplayer rumor, we spent some time contemplating just how it would work. A versus mode would be out of the question. If multiplayer ever touched Silent Hill, it would have to be an intimate co-op affair with a huge emphasis on team work and frequent, but momentary separation from your partner. Perhaps in the future something like this will come to fruition."

And I think they are dead on!

I don't see any reason why multiplayer couldn't work in a franchise like Silent Hill. It is something that would just have to be very well thought-out by the designers and developers in order to avoid falling into the trap of becoming a mindless shooter like Resident Evil has become.

So what kind of multiplayer scenarios probably wouldn't work?

Keep in mind that I say "probably" wouldn't work. There is always the possibility that a wünderkind designer could surprise us!

In most cases, competitive multiplayer just wouldn't fit in with the Silent Hill franchise (particularly deathmatches). A multiplayer fighter in which bubble-head nurses, Valtiel, Pyramid Head, Walter Sullivan, and split-head dogs are playable characters might make for an amusing mini-game Easter Egg, but would probably just end up taking time away from the single player story mode.

As mentioned above, a Resident Evil 5-inspired co-op shooter probably would not be very well-received either. Nor would anything more akin to Left 4 Dead. In fact, any multiplayer mode that puts action and monster-killing ahead of creepy atmosphere, intellectual problem-solving, and character-driven narrative would be a bad thing for most Silent Hill fans.

Well, what about an MMO? No, I highly doubt that Silent Hill Online would be very popular. I've already seen one of my beloved franchises ruined by a lackluster MMO game (Star Trek Online), I don't want to see another fall down the same path. Although an MMO-style online experience based around cooperative puzzle-solving and exploration would probably be more tolerable to fans of the series than a co-op shooter would be.

So what kind of multiplayer senario could work?

I've discounted competitive multiplayer, cooperative shooters, and MMOs. So what's left?

Well, there are two methodologies that I see as legitimate contenders for a possible Silent Hill game:

  1. Cooperative Campaign
  2. Indirect Multiplayer

Cooperative Campaign

A small-scale cooperative campaign in which multiple characters must interact within the town of Silent Hill. Essentially, I'm on the same page as Hell's Descent. Some sort of cooperative adventure/puzzle-solver could possibly work. The players involved would not even necessarily have to stick together throughout the entire game. The majority of the game could probably be played with each character off on their own, exploring the game world, fighting (or running) from monsters, and slipping in and out of the Otherworld; thus, maintaining the themes of isolation, lonliness, and despair.

A simple example would be to imagine the PS3 game Heavy Rain. The player in that game controls 4 different characters as they all attempt to solve one mystery. Imagine if each of the characters in Heavy Rain was being played by a different person. Such a scenario could be fit into a Silent Hill game.

For example, imagine a remake of the first Silent Hill game (again) that is designed as a multiplayer experience in which Harry Mason, Cybil Bennet, and maybe even Doctor Kaufman are all playable characters. Different players could assume the role of each playable character and play through that character's entire story independantly, but within the same game world. So the characters would occasionally run into each other, and would have to interact to solve certain puzzles or gain access to certain areas. But each character would have their own story, agenda, and their actions during the game would affect the communal conclusion to the game. Harry would be searching for his daughter. Cybil could spend the majority of the game trying to solve the mysteries behind the town's cult and the White Claudia drug-smuggling that the first game hinted at, but never expounded upon. And Kaufman could be trying to gather components to make the aglaophotis in order to stop Dahlia from summoning the town's god.

Silent Hill boat wheel - don't worry about it now. So worry about it later then?

In fact, the first Silent Hill game is even rumored to originally been planned as having a separate story for Cybil - similar to how Resident Evil 2 had two different stories (one for Leon and one for Claire). I don't think there's ever been any confirmation from Konami as to whether or not Cybil was supposed to be playable, but certain unuseable items (such as the glucose, distilled water bottle, undriveable ambulance, the boat steering wheel, and other such "Don't worry about that now" items) seemed to imply that segments of the game were cut. These could have simply been unnecessary levels, additional endings, or (as rumored) could have been the results of un-removed overlap between Harry's story and a scrapped playable scenario for Cybil. So it is not too far fetched to imagine that if a scenario for Cybil had been made, and if two people could play them simultaneously in the same game world, then you'd have a solid multiplayer Silent Hill game. Heck, if the technology had existed back then, Silent Hill could have started as a multiplayer game!

Alternatively, here's another possible scenario: imagine, if you will, that a small family or group of people is coming to Silent Hill for a vacation. They could be going to the amusement park, or camping near the lake, or what have you. Remember, Silent Hill is a resort town! A game could be constructed such that each character in the group could be a playable character. They could get separated early in the game, and then each get dragged into some crazy stuff going on in the town, and then spend the rest of the game trying to meet back up and get the hell out.

Again, each player would essentially be playing what would feel like a single-player game for the most part, but each character's story would be interrelated, and what happens to one character would affect the others who are playing.

In order for such a scenario to work though, we would need several criteria to be met:

  • Each character and his/her story would have to be unique and interesting. No, they do not have to have some "dark secret". People tend to forget that Silent Hill games are not always about characters with "dark secrets". Silent Hill 1, Silent Hill 3, and Silent Hill 4 were all completely impersonal stories in which the protagonist was dragged into a situation outside of their control. Only Silent Hill 2 revolved around a character going to the town to unwittingly face his own sins!
  • The game would not work well as a "drop in-drop out" game. So players would need to find a steady group who is going to play the game all the way through from start to finish in order to maintain the immersion and consistency that would be necessary to make a scenario work. This would probably mean such a game would be more suited to a short, several-hour-long XBox Live or PSN title (hey wait a minute, wasn't that what Konami said they had been considering?), or a series of distinct, episodic stories.
  • The entire game would have to be conceived and designed around this mechanic! This would NOT work as a simple optional extra feature or unlockable, otherwise, the game would be designed around one character, and the people playing as the other characters would be stuck in tacked-on supporting roles - which would not be fun.
  • The characters would probably need some method of communication, either walkie-talkies or cell phones, so that they can ask for help from the others when necessary, but access to communication would have to be limited in order to maintain the illusion of isolation.

But those are all solvable problems for a talented creative team.

To me, the hardest challenge for a design team making a multiplayer Silent Hill experience would be how to handle character death. Obviously, when one character dies, the game can't take the whole group back to the last checkpoint. that would be irritating. Also, the designers couldn't make the characters impervious to death, as that would eliminate most of the fear. So if one character dies, would the rest of the group have to just move on without him or her? That might not be fun either.

A mechanic similar to Shattered Memories could be implemented, in which much of the game is simple exploration without the danger of enemies. Then, when the characters all meet, it could trigger entrance into the Otherworld, where they would all have to worry about monsters and maybe even a boss fight. This would create an association between "meeting another character" and "impending death", and might actually make each player afraid of encountering the others and would make them less likely to try to force interaction, since doing so would be putting themselves in danger.

So, I've talked about Silent Hill as a cooperative title, and given two examples of how it could work. So what was the other methodology that could work for making Silent Hill a multiplayer experience?

Indirect Multiplayer

Did you ever play Demon's Souls? That game has a unique and innovative multiplayer mechanic in which characters could both directly and indirectly interact with one another. Players could leave notes and clues throughout the levels, and any other player in that same level could find those notes and clues and rate them based on usefulness. The Silent Hill games have always been very note-heavy. Everywhere you go, you're finding clues and notes left by the residents of the town. Some of them make sense, most of them do not. So what if some of those notes could be left by other players?

Demon's Souls online message example => Silent Hill 2 - there was a hole here, it's gone now

Imagine how much less frustrating the Otherworld hospital would have been in Silent Hill 1 if other players could leave a note in the "zodiac room" saying "It's the number of limbs, stupid!"

Or maybe leaving puzzle solutions would take away the fun of the Silent Hill games. In any case, Demon's Souls could be a great inspiration for future horror game designers who are trying to find creative ways to include multiplayer or online components into their games!

Conclusion

The bottom line is that multiplayer should not be discarded as an idea for moving the Silent Hill franchise forward in the future. There are ways that a multiplayer experience could be designed to work within the style of game that is Silent Hill without sacrificing the game's narrative or tone. Its just a matter of careful design. Hopefully, Downpour will be very good, and will kickstart the franchise once again, and open up the doors to new ways for us to experience our favorite horror game's universe!

Tags:, , , , , ,

Comments (4) -

Valentina
Valentina
10/06/2013 08:15:21 #

That is actually interesting, especially the small family/group of people option.
In my opinion they would not even ave to start all together and be separated early, they might just arrive in town separately, in different places, and become aware of each other somehow (radio communications?) and then have to do their best in order to meet (if they want to). They should be able to actually look for each other and go help the ones in danger or simply leave notes or items somewhere for the other players ("indirect multiplayer", as you called it), which reminds of the scenario A/ scenario B interection in Resident Evil 2 (Claire left the backpack for me! How thoughtful of her!).
Which is possible since, as you explained so well, there aren't "alternate dimensions" in the videogames, although the movie suggests something different.
A character's death (or the fact that the player leaves the game, I don't know how it is called) should not affect the other characters' plot, maybe it could give them lower scores or a different ending.
That would be a cool multiplayer Silent Hill!
Although I agree, to some extent, with the objection that Silent Hill is also about isolation.
Since I first palyed Resident Evil 1 and 2, I was somehow shocked when I realized that in Silent Hill 2 characters did not care to cooperate or stick together. In RE, characters were usually separated against their will (Claire and Leon having to make it to the police station separately after the car crash because of the fire, Sherry Birkin falling into a sewer (!!)). Humans form a pack against the physical threat of the zombies, just upon a "Don't shoot, I'm a HUMAN" and even if one of them is anti-umbrella and the other works for umbrella.
In SH they meet, have a chat an then go each their own way, or at least I got that impression from SH 2, 3 and Downpour. This is especially true with the n. 2 and Downpour, wich share the theme of "inner demons" that each character prefers to keep secret, facing them alone (Maria is the only one who does not want to be left alone, but she is... well, Maria).
But SH1 is about the search for Cheryl, so I can easily picture two characters who are relatives or friends, played by two players, looking for each other.

10/06/2013 16:59:04 #

I had not considered the idea that both characters could be looking for each other (i.e. Harry looking for Cheryl, and Cheryl looking for Harry). That's a good idea.

Valentina
Valentina
10/07/2013 06:04:44 #

Thank you! I must have thought that because, if I found myself in Silent Hill, I would be SO desperately looking for another human being!
Characters might start from random locations and their position may not appear on each other's maps, so they would really have no clue where the others are.
You pointed out that the feeling of isolation could be mantained by restricting access to communication, so I thought the communication device (like a cellphone or a walkie talkie) could not be readily available (players could find it more or less early in the game and have to rely on "indirect" cooperation until then). The device could malfunction in certain places or times, likely when you most need it to work.
I also agree that characters should reunite towards the end of the game and escape the town together... and that is the perfect time for a huge boss fight, so it is better to have many survivors.
Yes, multiplayer SH could actually make sense!

10/07/2013 09:47:27 #

Indeed. It could be a good idea for a sequel or offshoot game. I've been thinking of making my own short Silent Hill fan-game, and I have another post about some ideas I had about such a game's plot / concept:
www.megabearsfan.net/.../Silent-Hill-Over.aspx
You should check it out. Your idea would probably work well with some of mine, so I wouldn't mind reading your feedback.

Contribute Comment

avatar


We'll incarnate your avatar from the services below.
PlayStation Network Steam Xbox LIVE Facebook MySpace Pinterest Twitter YouTube deviantART LiveJournal



biuquote
  • Comment
  • Preview


Grid Clock Widget
12      60
11      55
10      50
09      45
08      40
07      35
06      30
05      25
04      20
03      15
02      10
01      05
Grid Clock provided by trowaSoft.

A gamer's life...

Welcome to Mega Bears Fan's blog, and thanks for visiting! This blog is mostly dedicated to game reviews, strategies, and analysis of my favorite games. I also talk about my other interests, like football, science and technology, movies, and so on. Feel free to read more about the blog.

Follow me on Twitter at: twitter.com/MegaBearsFan

Featured Post

College football playoff expansion is inevitable. Who should get in?College football playoff expansion is inevitable. Who should get in?01/16/2015 Advocates of a college football championship playoff may feel a little vindicated after the inaugural championship game earlier this week. The #4 ranked Ohio State Buckeyes defeated the #2 ranked Oregon Ducks with a decisive three-score lead. And they did this after also defeating the #1 ranked Alabama Crimson Tide. For years,...

Month List

Random Post

Stupid NFL rule changes (part 2-a): Reviewing all "scoring" playsStupid NFL rule changes (part 2-a): Reviewing all "scoring" plays09/18/2011 The Saints' Darren Sproles stepped out of bounds prior to scoring a touchdown in a game against the Bears. This play was ruled as a touchdown on-the-field, but was not reviewed by the booth! Last week, I offered my thoughts on the NFL's rule change regarding reviews of scoring plays. In summary, I thought the rule was stupid....